The truth about health supplements

Scientist VTB test and goes over medical benefits and claimed truths of today’s health supplements.

Duration : 0:9:57


[youtube RRmQJJD-SBc]

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to The truth about health supplements

  1. carrieandjames says:

    u r a fuking hippy …
    u r a fuking hippy bthe 60s are over get over it dumb fuk

  2. seeriktus says:

    youre too awesome …
    youre too awesome man
    jizz video

  3. yessurmaster23 says:

    How long did you …
    How long did you test these products before stating they don’t work and how you know if the company was any good that you got the supplement from I know for sure natures way is a company. Anyway you cant take that stuff in one day and expect it to work you have to take it for weeks sometimes months. And more importantly you have to find a good company that really put what they say they’re going to put in it without any fillers and make sure it’s high quality

  4. cynthiaall says:

    GABA is not just …
    GABA is not just used by the brain. GABA is wonderful. I was sleeping 2 hours a night and waking up with massive muscle pain. The first time I took GABA before bed, I was fine. Wine before bed works also. If you need GABA, you really need GABA.

  5. jaso19 says:

    Rastas weren’t the …
    Rastas weren’t the first ones man ROFL!! you dumbfuck..

  6. leakystarfish says:

    Oh, and 10-20% of …
    Oh, and 10-20% of people have a ragweed allergy.

  7. f1zhRCjuggalo says:

    yes i said it once …
    yes i said it once and ill say it again Duck you…….duck you and duck everyone thats cool with you…….DUCK you

    i knew you were gonna point that out so i did it myself……..duck off bitch

  8. f1zhRCjuggalo says:

    lmfao your retarded …
    lmfao your retarded…….it is in no way disrespectful

    rastas aint the onlyones with dreadlockZZZZZZZ

    i know some rastaz n they could give a less what a white guys hair looks like……..so duck you leaky bitch

  9. leakystarfish says:

    USE IT to look up …
    USE IT to look up the definition for some of these words that you throw around like dead cats in a sack.

    If you are going to shoot down bullshit, unsubstantiated, unscientific claims, at least have the ambition to learn HOW one would go about testing a hypothesis before you go ranting and yelling about how ginseng takers are retarded.

    Your lack of cited sources OR evidence makes you as ridiculous as the people you so arrogantly fail to prove wrong.

    Shut the up, go to school.

  10. leakystarfish says:

    1 You are an …
    1 You are an uneducated with weak and incorrect usage of the English language and an incoherent speaking style.

    You are utterly clueless about anything scientific, and are stuck confusing experiments with observational studies. That doesnt really matter, because you do not do either. Looking up random, wrong, opinionated “information” on internet sites is not a experiment or study, it is just stupid.

    Seriously, you clearly have the internet……

  11. leakystarfish says:

    Yeah, well I think …
    Yeah, well I think it is disrespectful to Rasta heritage for a lameass punk buttfuck white guy to have dreads, so you Juggalo.

    Or do I have to add some Z’s so you understandz?

  12. f1zhRCjuggalo says:

    dude i used to have …
    dude i used to have dreadz……..whats your problem with dreadz? and why do you think only non white people can have dreadz?………thats just racist

  13. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    (sep 28 -3)
    Is a …

    (sep 28 -3)
    Is a test worthless if someone only has around 3 test subjects? Less worthless than asking 1 friend if a drug works. You got me that if I had 50 test sub, i could have done better. But to verify that the most basic effects claimed didnt happen on 12 or so drugs, It would make sense to assume that they probably dont work.

  14. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    (sep 28 -2)Again no …
    (sep 28 -2)Again no matter how bad an experiment is and how flagrant the observations are. bigger words like flagrant are still as non substantive as saying bad, maybe you should explain why they are flagrant. Lets get to an actual attack of how i did the tests without just saying they were bad.
    -Its legitimate to say the tests did not have a double blind or any placebo tests. However this is clear from before you even click on the thumbnail. 3-

  15. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    (sep 28 -1)You …
    (sep 28 -1)You found a grammatical error, I use spell check a lot to. 2. too. I thought you were attacking the way i conduct tests rather than grammar. Arguing about if you scored a point over me not having spelling common sense is less important than you still using the word experiment wrong. Better to miss type than to be wrong.
    -You are now using bigger words wrong to step up your game. Empirical refers to observations obtained from an experiment. 2-

  16. leakystarfish says:

    Look up sense/since …
    Look up sense/since in the dictionary.

    You didnt do an experiment, you make flagrant assumptions from a shittily designed observation. You have no empirical evidence, you have no experiment. I am sure your stinks all the time, but SINCE you dont have a control, it isnt an experiment either.

    Did you drop out or something? These are really elementary principals here.

  17. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    (Sep 27 part 3)
    3- …

    (Sep 27 part 3)
    3- Having said that, it would make no sense to expect an at home video maker to live up to the highest guidelines for any test you can find. Notable to make clear cause your steering towards the direction of faulting me on things like not having 500 test subjects. Furthermore I state here and may god or another youtube viewer hang me by my balls if im wrong, I did live up to the highest test procedures given the resources shown in the video, making it a good job experiment wise.

  18. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    (Sep 27 part 2)
    2- …

    (Sep 27 part 2)
    2- “Im seeing if my doesn’t stink on days that I call people on definitions, next week ill test if my stink is reduced even further if i actually have the definition right.”
    I could locate key parts of some definitions of experiment you could be hung up on but they still wont include scientific method sense experiment is a component in what scientific method is. 3-

  19. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    (Sep 27 part 1)
    The …

    (Sep 27 part 1)
    The 1st two statements of yours make sense if you dont take into account the group im talking to. Even though i dont plan to only make videos that are credible to chamomile nazis who claim to make out to gia on a regular basis, those are still the largest group of customers who buy these rip off supplements.
    There is no doubt multiple definitions of experiment which usually apply to what the average person will use the word for. Example 2-

  20. leakystarfish says:

    No, dreads on a …
    No, dreads on a white guy work as a free card for everyone to know just how bad of judgment you have.

    Also let people know that you are too lazy to wash your hair, probably too lazy to bath, smoke a lot of pot, and are proud of all of the above for no reason at all.

    Without use of the scientific method, it is not an experiment, no matter if you say it is or not.

  21. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    -Dreadlocks work as …
    -Dreadlocks work as the free card to be taken seriously by the kind of people who take health supplements.
    -”Terrible reply” isn’t that substantive without explaining why. again “dumb” and “terrible” are insults that are already implied. Stating general insults only leaves a response of not true.
    -You state that I have no experimental basis for any of my information. Im guessing you meant scientific or logical cause experimental basis would still cover any experiment no matter how stupid.

  22. leakystarfish says:

    You throw around a …
    You throw around a lot of numbers for a person with no experimental basis for any of your information.

    Not one person is going to take a white guy with dreadlocks seriously. The rest of the you do just ensures it.

    Your terrible reply shows how dumb you are. Sense? Your?

    I’ll give you this… Anyone that is stupid enough to come to youTube to look for peoples opinions on drugs, just may be dumb enough to appreciate your incoherent banter.

  23. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    3-for battling …
    3-for battling purposes a response would be in order. Dentist, reptile, ehh. The only part worth responding to is the 2 words you found “scientific method.” Its obvious with the resources i have of maybe 5 test subjects and 1 or 2 sources for the product, the amount of testing i do is limited. That doesnt discredit my conclusions sense the point of looking up drugs on utube is to get real peoples opinions.Which are often tainted by peoples high expectations.

  24. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    2-which would be …
    2-which would be pretty telling if you knew them in person. This video shows the peak of yelling and dressing up cause it was an early one. My obnoxious way of being gets across to the people that i am the same type of person who would give these products a try. The idea is to get to know me and my opinion to gain trust in the future. The last thing i would do is lie cause eventually it would be exposed in the future.3-

  25. LEATHERrebelJUSTICE says:

    1-So if you were …
    1-So if you were going to try a supplement you’d prefer not to hear someones opinion on it. A scientific study will include better tests, however the words “scientist have discovered” works as 1 of the most powerful propaganda tools. Just like asking a friend will hold more weight than public opinion. My video shows what 1-4 people think of some products, Unless im hiding some alternate agenda, all your seeing is a few people who using these products with no result 2-